Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 48983 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2002 13:29:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Aug 2002 13:29:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 1710 invoked by uid 97); 20 Aug 2002 13:29:55 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1685 invoked by uid 97); 20 Aug 2002 13:29:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1658 invoked by uid 98); 20 Aug 2002 13:29:54 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Message-ID: <83F0258A9996D311B14200A0C98F17360275555E@aas-internet.aas.com> From: "Turner, John" To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 09:29:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N It's true. There are two different apache directories in the connectors tree: apache-1.3 and apache-2.0. My How-To only details building in apache-1.3. "ap_table_get" is an Apache 1.3 API function, so to get mod_jk to work with Apache 2.0.39/40 requires something different that what is currently in my How-To. I'm not saying definitively that mod_jk doesn't work with apache 2 (I don't see why it wouldn't), just that I haven't figured it out yet myself, and haven't updated my document, which folks seem to be using. I'm trying to avoid people wasting their time by relying on my document in a scenario it doesn't support yet. John Turner jturner@NOSPAM.aas.com -----Original Message----- From: Sullivan, Mark E [mailto:Mark.Sullivan@nav-international.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 9:18 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux That's not necessarily true. I'm running mod_jk on rh 7.3 with apache 2.0.39 and tomcat 4+. I had no problems building or using the module. I don't remember having to do anything special when building the module either. > -----Original Message----- > From: Turner, John [mailto:JTurner@AAS.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:08 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on > linux > > > > I just built apache 2.0.40 and tried to get it working with > mod_jk.so on RH > 7.2. No luck...the mod_jk.so file that works with 1.3.26 is > not compatible > with 2.0.40. The error message I get is: > > Cannot load /usr/local/apache2/lib/mod_jk.so into server: > /usr/local/apache2/lib/mod_jk.so: undefined symbol: ap_table_get > > So, right off the bat, I can tell you that the instructions > in my How-To > will only work with apache 1.3.26, not 2.0.39/40. I will > have to research > if it is a do-or-die problem with mod_jk (which means > switching to mod_jk2), > or just a rebuild of mod_jk with options that allow use with apache > 2.0.39/40. > > John Turner > > -----Original Message----- > From: Turner, John [mailto:JTurner@AAS.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:15 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on > linux > > > > I notice you mentioned that you had copied the JAR files to > CATALINA_HOME/common after building the connector. This is > one area that > confuses me about connecting apache to tomcat with mod_jk. > The docs I read > told me to build those JARs, but I don't have them anywhere in my > CATALINA_HOME tree, I left them in the source-build > directory. As far as I > can tell, they aren't needed. > > This might be the problem, or, if it isn't, did you find a resource > someplace that explained what the JAR files are for, where > they should go, > and why? I didn't find one, and would be interested in reading it. > > My memory is hazy, too, but it seems to me that apache 2.x > requires mod_jk2, > not mod_jk. If I have a chance today I will build 2.0.39 > from source and > see if it works instead of 1.3.26 in my currently-working > apache+tomcat+mod_jk environment. > > John Turner > jturner@NOSPAM.aas.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mathew Pole [mailto:Mathew.Pole@clipsal.com.au] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 3:28 AM > To: 'tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org' > Subject: BAD packet - Apache 2.0.39 + mod_jk (or mod_webapp) on linux > > > Hi , > > At first glance the following combination sounded like a great idea > (especially as I had success with this on windows 2000): > tomcat 4.0.4 > tomcat connectors 4.0.4 > apache 2.0.39 > linux (gentoo 1.2 distribution) > In reality it has proved very challenging. I've tried the following: > > Following instructions provided by John Turner in > http://www.johnturner.com/howto/apache-tomcat-howto.html, I > came across a > couple of issues which I resolved by > failed trying to build the mod_jk.so, but after setting > apache13.home to a > bogus location and running ant native it appears to have worked > copied jk/build/lib/mod_jk.so apache2/modules > copied jk/build/lib/*.jar to tomcat/common > updated apache.conf file as suggested > updated server.xml as suggested, with addition of > modJk="/usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so" in the listener > definition > Currently, in the tomcat/logs/catalina.out file the following text is > appearing (note the string after In : : [ changes, but 4/843 remains > constant): > > BAD packet 256 > In: : [B@3e58d4 4/843 > > followed by what appears to be some hex output of mainly 00s. > > My suspicion is that this error is caused by one of: > mod_jk.so being compiled incorrectly > connector jar files being compiled incorrectly or being in > the wrong place > incorrect configuration > I've also attached logs & configuration files to this email. > Hopefully this > is enough information for someone to help me. > > In addition to this I looked at the instructions in > http://wass.homelinux.net/howtos/Jakarta_How-To.shtml, but the > mod-jk-303-ap20.so doesn't work with apache 2.0.39. > > > > Regards, > Mathew > -- > Mathew Pole > Web Architect, Gerard Industries > email: mathew.pole@clipsal.com.au > phone: 08 8269 0511 ext 313, fax: 08 8340 1212, mobile: 0403 164 617 > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: