Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 55724 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2002 17:33:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jun 2002 17:33:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 23310 invoked by uid 97); 24 Jun 2002 17:33:05 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23294 invoked by uid 97); 24 Jun 2002 17:33:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23282 invoked by uid 98); 24 Jun 2002 17:33:04 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:32:51 -0500 (CDT) From: Milt Epstein X-X-Sender: To: Tomcat Users List , Jacob Kjome Subject: Re: Re[2]: MOD_JK Problem ? In-Reply-To: <1332109523.20020624093914@visi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Jacob Kjome wrote: [ ... ] > As much as you and I would like the Apache developers to produce > binary versions of the software they develop, it is not really their > responsibility. It is all of ours. If you believe differently, > then you misunderstand open source. I'm not so familiar with how to [ ... ] FWIW (i.e. this discussion probably doesn't belong here), I don't agree completely with this. Yes, Apache is open source, and a volunteer effort, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't expect them to do some/all of these things. It's simply a matter of where they draw the line of what they will/won't do. For example, using your reasoning, they could just as easily only provide the source code, without any makefiles or build tools or such, or even any documentation at all. But they do provide those. Providing binaries for the most popular platforms is just another step in making things more convenient for users, in making a product that's that much easier to get started with. And this should be relatively easy to do, because I assume they're building things regularly (so they can test them) for some of these platforms. This is especially true for Tomcat and Tomcat-related software, because it is the reference implementation of the servlet spec. (Of course, that also suggests that Sun should provide some support, and in fact, they do, although I don't know how much.) Another FWIW, I too have to admit a lot of frustration with the state of the tomcat connectors, especially documentation, and problems building it. I was able to get Tomcat integrated with Apache up on one site in less than half an hour -- but that was mostly because it was Solaris and I was able to grab a binary of the connector. Now I need to do it for AIX, and I need to build the connector myself, and it's been quite a hassle. (I also didn't care too much about which connector it was on the Solaris machine, because it was just a test site; the AIX one is production, and I need to know which connector I should go with.) Milt Epstein Research Programmer Systems and Technology Services (STS) Campus Information Technologies and Educational Services (CITES) University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) mepstein@uiuc.edu -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: