On Wednesday 26 June 2002 16:42, you wrote: > I remember one of our sys admins having issues (the SocketException > looks familiar) and just upgrading to 4.x through a tarball. It's not > pretty (and we miss being able to upgrade through apt-get), but > tomcat's working just fine now. Mmmmm, I see. I would of course like to use the .debs ("stick to your distro, son" is a common advice for people in my position) :-) Any other options....? :-) >Any reason why you're using apache > from unstable instead of testing? Hehe, I asked the same question to debian-apache yesterday... :-) Long story, really (I guess OT), but since you asked: Basically, there is some confusion as to the upgrade cycle right now, I'm certainly confused. They created unofficial 1.3.26 debs for Woody in a hurry, but that's not the way it is usually done, since security upgrades is usually just for stable. I have unstable in my sources.list (I wanted gnupg-1.0.7 some time ago, it had a new feature I really needed), but set default distro to testing. For some reason not quite clear to me, apt told me that I should upgrade to the one in unstable... So I did. From the response I got in debian-apache, I think they probably differ only in version number. Best, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Astrophysicist/IT Consultant/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaineer kjetil@kjernsmo.net webmaster@skepsis.no editor@learn-orienteering.org Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: