tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ralph Einfeldt" <>
Subject AW: Design Question: Static vs. Dynamic
Date Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:45:49 GMT
With this amount of users I wouldn't think about caching the html 
output for dynamic elements. 

What we do is to cache essential data from the database and generate 
the pages on the fly. That design works with several 1000 hits an 
hour. (Not with tomcat but with jserv and gnujsp, but I don't have 
doubts that tomcat will perform equal)

> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jacob Hookom []
> Gesendet: Montag, 24. Juni 2002 19:34
> An: Tomcat Users List
> Betreff: Design Question: Static vs. Dynamic
> Is it traditional practice to write long term data to static html like
> large scale sites such as cnet, or zdnet (links such as
> 1109200304,43904043A,44032.html)?  If so, how do they bring in dynamic
> elements?  Or, in your own experience, have you found benefits from
> transferring bits of page content to static hmtl (OSCache for 
> example)?

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message