From tomcat-user-return-20523-qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Fri May 24 08:04:48 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 62908 invoked from network); 24 May 2002 08:04:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 May 2002 08:04:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 27146 invoked by uid 97); 24 May 2002 08:04:37 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27079 invoked by uid 97); 24 May 2002 08:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27067 invoked by uid 98); 24 May 2002 08:04:36 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Message-ID: <3CEDF412.3010600@nisports.com> Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 09:04:34 +0100 From: David Cassidy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Linux - high cpu usage/seg faults - SOLVED References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Was the reason you tried the IBM JDK because of performance ? I'm rather interrested in knowing if there is any difference in speed... Ta D Joakim Ryden wrote: >It was a rookie thing. :( > >The two servers were of course not identical. :) The problem machine did not >have the libc compat libs installed. The funny thing is that IBM's jdk >didn't give any indications about this whatosever. When I installed the sun >jdk the catalina log immediately showed the error in loading the shared libs >and things were easy from there... Oh well, at least it's resolved. :) >thanks for your replies guys! > >--Jo > > > >>From: Phillip Morelock >>Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" >>Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 22:05:47 -0700 >>To: Tomcat Users List >>Subject: Re: Linux - high cpu usage/seg faults >> >>try the sun jdk and find if there's a difference, would be the first thing >>on my list. Should be an easy "sniff test" or whatever. >> >>fillup >> >> >>On 5/23/02 3:09 PM, "Joakim Ryden" wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hey guys - >>> >>>I just installed tomcat 4.0.3 on two identical (software wise) spanking new >>>servers. One is working a treat and the other is completely hosed. :( >>> >>>I'm using the IBMJava2-131 jdk on both machines - the one machine having >>>problems is an SMP machine. They are both running RedHat 7.2 - the only file >>>touched after the rpm installation is /etc/tomcat4/tomcat4.conf to set up >>>the correct paths. Starting up tomcat gives no errors in any logs but CPU >>>usage immediately runs high - stays in the mid-upper 20's. Attaching strace >>>to any of the running java processes shows a constant stream of: >>> >>>--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) --- >>> >>>So I go to stop tomcat. Shut down script says OK but the processes don't go >>>away although the catalina logs say otherwise. I'm not sure what else to >>>look for? Can anyone point me in some sort of direction? >>> >>>Many thanks! >>> >>>--Jo >>> >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>For additional commands, e-mail: >>> >>> >>> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>For additional commands, e-mail: >> >> >> >> >> > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: >For additional commands, e-mail: > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: