Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 87092 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2002 20:04:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2002 20:04:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 10281 invoked by uid 97); 5 Apr 2002 20:04:39 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10265 invoked by uid 97); 5 Apr 2002 20:04:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10248 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2002 20:04:38 -0000 Message-ID: <008501c1dcdd$0af758f0$ce6c28ce@chad> From: "Chad Johnson" To: Subject: Internal tomcat jar's compressed Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:04:06 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hey, I notice that most, if not all, of the jar's packaged with Tomcat (4.0.3) are compressed. I can only guess that unpacking all these jar's only adds additional overhead, and time to starting Tomcat up. Whats the general consensus, would packaging these jar's up uncompressed save some time on the startup process? -Chad Johnson -- To unsubscribe: For additional commands: Troubles with the list: