From tomcat-user-return-17692-qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Wed Apr 24 15:14:55 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 98488 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 15:14:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 15:14:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 14669 invoked by uid 97); 24 Apr 2002 15:14:29 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14654 invoked by uid 97); 24 Apr 2002 15:14:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14643 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 15:14:28 -0000 Message-ID: From: "Short, Dave" To: "'Tomcat Users List'" Subject: RE: Which Apache-To-Tomcat Connector Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:14:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2654.89) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N In which version is this projected to be fixed? -----Original Message----- From: Simon Stewart [mailto:sms@lateral.net] Sent: April 24, 2002 8:11 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Which Apache-To-Tomcat Connector It isn't so. You can still serve static pages, but they'll come through Tomcat and then apache, rather than being served straight from apache. End result: you'll see a speed hit. This is what's being fixed, as I understand it. On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:00:59PM +0000, Lance Smith wrote: > Using: Apache 2.0.35 and Tomcat 4.0.3 on Red Hat 7.2. > > Say it isn't so: There is no way to serve static pages from Apache using > mod_webapp? Can anyone confirm/deny this? > > Lance > > >> The major difference between the two modules, other than this, is that > >> mod_jk allows static content to be served directly from Apache rather > >> than going through Tomcat, and mod_jk has provision for doing > >> loadbalancing across multiple servers. Of these, the former is > >> (apparently) going to be fixed at some point in the near future. Cheers, Simon -- "I'm sorry, you must be confusing me with someone who gives a damn." -- To unsubscribe: For additional commands: Troubles with the list: -- To unsubscribe: For additional commands: Troubles with the list: