tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan K." <dant...@YorkU.CA>
Subject Re: Which Apache-To-Tomcat Connector
Date Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:47:46 GMT
Hi,

I thought mod_webapp was suppose to be the successor to mod_jk in tomcat
4.x, and mod_jk only existed for backwards compatibility for tomcat 3.x.
Don't know about mod_jk2 though...

Regards,
Dan

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Michael Delamere wrote:

> Although I donīt have the answer, itīs a VERY interesting question.  As you
> said, it appeared that mod_webapp would eventually replace mod_jk which has
> been said to become deprectated at some stage (correct me if I got the
> information wrong).
>
> So why is there a new version of mod_jk?
>
> Unfortunately after visiting the jakarta site Iīm none the wiser :-).
>
> bye Michael Delamere
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Stewart" <sms@lateral.net>
> To: "Tomcat Users List" <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:23 PM
> Subject: Re: Which Apache-To-Tomcat Connector
>
>
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 08:04:17AM -0400, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 07:02:38PM -0400, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
> > > > > Any reason for using AJP14 over AJP13?
> > > > > And what about mod_webapp?
> > > >
> > > > I take it that this is mod_jk and mod_jk2? IME, mod_jk and Apache 2
> > > > don't get along well at all[1]. The impression that I've gleaned from
> > > > reading past postings to this list is that mod_webapp is meant to
> > > > supercede mod_jk and is the preferred way of connecting Apache and
> > > > Tomcat.
> > > >
> > >
> > > If mod_webapp is the next generation then why jk2?
> >
> > That question can be read in two ways: "Why did I start off using
> > jk2?" and "why is there a jk2 project, then?"
> >
> > To answer the first question: because at the time, I hadn't done much
> > reading around the subject, and mod_jk was what the other admins that
> > I spoke to were using, albeit with apache 1.3.x
> >
> > The answer to the second interpretation is probably the same :) Also,
> > jk offers some features that webapp doesn't, which may be an incentive
> > for people to want to try and make it work with apache 2.
> >
> > > Is warp in the coyote connectors the mod_webapp that should be used???
> >
> > Good question. The connector that makes use of it is mod_webapp, and
> > this is part of the jakarta-tomcat-connectors project, if that helps?
> > Getting a listing of the classes that are contained in the
> > "tomcat-*.jar" files doesn't indicate anything called "*warp*", but
> > that could just be because it's the protocol name....
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > --
> > Hanlon's Razor:
> > Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained
> > by stupidity.
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:tomcat-user-owner@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:tomcat-user-owner@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:tomcat-user-owner@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message