tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Donald Lee" <>
Subject RE: Apache 2.0.35 +
Date Sun, 07 Apr 2002 12:02:39 GMT
Yes I agree but in this situation, the file is
specifically stated on the Jakarta site as being for Apache 2.0.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul D. Bain []
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 11:06 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.35 +

At Saturday 4/6/02 10:43 PM, you wrote:
>Hi I got all excited when I got the announcement that Apache 2.0.35 was no
>longer a beta and was an official release so I downloaded the archive
>"httpd-2.0.35.tar.gz" and installed it.  I have only one hangup as of right
>now and that's the inability to make use of the mod_jk connector.  I am
>currently getting the error from apache
>"httpd: module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this version of Apache.
>Please contact the vendor for the correct version."
>I am using the exact same configuration as with my old 1.3.24 apache. With
>the exception of using the module. It sounds as if I
>would have to somehow know how to change the source code of this module to
>account for the differences between whatever version of Apache 2.0 this was
>compiled for and re-compile but frankly I haven't a clue where to start.


         That's exactly correct. Modules written for Apache 1.3 will _not_
work with Apache 2.0 unless they are re-written in order to be specific to
2.0. You should probably stick with 1.3.

-- Paul Bain

To unsubscribe:   <>
For additional commands: <>
Troubles with the list: <>

To unsubscribe:   <>
For additional commands: <>
Troubles with the list: <>

View raw message