tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Delamere" <h...@michael-delamere.de>
Subject Re: Apache+tomcat Integration....Confused....
Date Mon, 29 Apr 2002 08:03:22 GMT
1) mod_web_app is AFAIK barely beta, however the most stable for apache2.

2) mod_jk2 is being heavily developed right now and will not be replaced by
mod_webapp in the near future.


This was posted in the tomcat-dev list this morning:

[...]
However I do think we should somehow document better what's
happening - many people have the strange impression that
webapp is going to replace jk.
[...]

bye Michael Delamere



----- Original Message -----
From: "Vinay Singh" <vinays@sapient.com>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:00 AM
Subject: RE: Apache+tomcat Integration....Confused....


> As far as I know -
>
>
> 1) mod_webapp is latest and will continue to evolve
> 2) mod_jk will not see any future enhancements and will have only bug
fixes
> 3) sticky session load balancing works fantastically on solaris (8) with
> mod_jk (BIG PLUS)
> 4) for load balancing with mod_webapp you have to use external s/w piece
> like mod_backhand etc
>
>
> Vinay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zineddine Reggani [mailto:z.reggani@adwea.gov.ae]
> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 1:35 PM
> To: 'tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org'
> Subject: Apache+tomcat Integration....Confused....
>
>
> I am running Apache on Win2k and trying to use Apache with Tomcat. What
> should I choose mod_jk, mod_webapp or mod_proxy?  And what are the
> advantages/disadvantages of these implementation?
>
>


--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:tomcat-user-owner@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message