Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 34460 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 02:41:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO osaka.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.133) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 02:41:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 3684 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 02:43:43 -0000 Received: from nagoya.betaversion.org (192.18.49.131) by osaka.betaversion.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 02:43:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 26328 invoked by uid 97); 1 Nov 2001 02:40:52 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 26312 invoked by uid 97); 1 Nov 2001 02:40:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 26300 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 02:40:48 -0000 From: "Pritpal Dhaliwal" To: "Tomcat Users List" Subject: RE: comparison between SERVLET/JSP to Cold Fusion Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 18:55:21 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I think that ColdFusion is more for totally database backed websites. I personally had hard time making a website with coldfusion without using database. If there is some computations happening and all that sorts of stuff, I would use JSP. If all you have stuff coming straight out of the database, going straight into a database, and all you care about is putting your database on the web somehow, I would go coldFusion. Ofcourse using custom tags, you could get all that ColdFusion has to offer in JSP. Also to note, I have very little experience with coldFusion but a lot with JSP. Pritpal Dhaliwal -----Original Message----- From: Miao, Franco CAWS:EX [mailto:Franco.Miao@gems7.gov.bc.ca] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:28 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: comparison between SERVLET/JSP to Cold Fusion you need to pay thousand bucks for Coldfusion server first, no free server in the market like tomcat. Coldfusion is great product, it comes with lots feature, unlike Tomcat, Coldfusion is a commerical product so you will find great support from manufacturer. I will say it depenps on what do you want to do with your biz. Franco -----Original Message----- From: Henry [mailto:hxzhang@cs.ualberta.ca] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:20 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: comparison between SERVLET/JSP to Cold Fusion I am not familiar with cold fusion, but when using html can not fulfill our business needs for rich client side control (like input masks), does other product has better control on the client's side? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: