Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 62781 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2001 02:11:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2001 02:11:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 22674 invoked by uid 97); 29 Oct 2001 02:11:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 22663 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2001 02:11:37 -0000 Message-ID: <011201c1601f$c73d98c0$013d4641@athlon> From: "Chase" To: "Tomcat Users List" References: Subject: Re: Apache httpd + tomcat = flaky Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 20:16:54 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Troy" To: "Tomcat Users List" Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 8:04 PM Subject: Re: Apache httpd + tomcat = flaky > > Subject: Apache httpd + tomcat = flaky > > I'm running on W2K, apache 1.3.22 and Tomcat 4.0.1. > You sure that shouldn't read: W2k=flaky? > -smile- > RT :) It's not as bad as previous M$ stuff, you have to admit that. Final deployment is going to be on Solaris, this is just my test box. If I break something here it's easy to reinstall, after the number of reinstalls of Windows I've had to do, I could do it in my sleep :) (not that it took a rocket scientist to begin with.....but you get the point) -Chase -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: