Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 13862 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2001 17:23:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 13855 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2001 17:23:56 -0000 Received: from mail1.concur.com (HELO mail1.concurtech.net) (63.92.166.64) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 17:23:56 -0000 Received: by mail1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3T4TLYTZ>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:23:34 -0700 Message-ID: From: Todd Carmichael To: "'tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:23:30 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N I have found better scalability with IBM, but less stability. I have had acceptable scalability with JDK and rock solid stability. My stress tests were done on single and quad servers on win2k. -----Original Message----- From: Hari [mailto:harir@kumaran.com] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:15 AM To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org; Rob S. Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Hi Rob, I didn't do comprehensive tests. Just started tomcat, wait about 20 sec, and stop tomcat (using the batch files, on Win2K). I didn't test on Linux. For this 'test' ;-) Sun JDK responds well than IBM JDK. - Hari. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob S." To: Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:10 PM Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance > Again demonstrating that performance is completely dependant upon the OS, JDK, type of web application, etc. Blanket statements like, "Tomcat is faster/slower than some other container" are *pretty much* (not completely) useless nowadays. > > How hard is it to install JDKs and test? Change the value of JAVA_HOME, restart the container, and run your tests again... > > - r > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:49:42 +0530 tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Which JDK gives best performance for TOMCAT 3.2 on Win2k & Linux? I heard > > that IBM jdk will give higher performance but when I run Tomcat using IBM > > Jdk I feel it is slower than Sun's (on Windows 2000). > > > > Kindly advice me in this regard. > > > > - Hari. > > > > ===================================== > > Hariharasubramanian.R > > Developer, iEvents, > > Kumaran Systems (Betawave Solutions) > > www.kumaran.com > > www.betawavesolutions.com > > Reinforcing Your Business > > Ph: 0091-44-620 2079, 4967 (Extn: 318/328) > > E-Mail: harir@kumaran.com > > >