Return-Path: 
 <tomcat-user-return-46057-apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57660 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2001 14:50:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57649 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 14:50:05 -0000
Received: from smtp-ft3.fr.colt.net (213.41.78.27)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 14:50:05 -0000
Received: from www2.cs (access-138.93.rev.fr.colt.net [213.41.93.138])
	by smtp-ft3.fr.colt.net with ESMTP id f7TEu7d03834
	for <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:56:07 +0200
Received: from css4.cs (css4.cs [172.31.1.8])
	by www2.cs (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA07373
	for <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:50:06 +0200
Received: by css4.cs with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <Q0QMT43Z>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:50:05 +0200
Message-ID: <D84B43C5F94DD511877400609457497C01C712@css4.cs>
From: GOMEZ Henri <hgomez@slib.fr>
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:50:01 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

It was answered many times before.

http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09075.html

People should really take a look at :

USER LIST :

http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user%40jakarta.apache.org/

DEV LIST :

http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-dev%40jakarta.apache.org/

-
Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Weissenbacher [mailto:MWeissenbacher@net4you.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:14 PM
>To: 'tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org'
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>thank you, i've always wondered about this...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jan Labanowski [mailto:jkl@osc.edu]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
>To: 'tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org'
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>It seems like you can either be correct or you have to make it easy for
>people who refuse to read the background information.
>
>"mod_jk-eapi.so" is for the EAPI (Extended Application Programming
>Interface) of
>Apache. You USUALLY need the EAPI when you install mod_ssl module for
>Apache.
>But you can have Apache EAPI without having mod_ssl installed/loaded.
>So, you can have the combinations:
>
>  Apache + EAPI + (no mod_ssl) + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>and you can have the combination
>
>  Apache + EAPI + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>
>
>But you cannot have combination
>
>  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>or
>
>  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>
>But you can have:
>
>  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-noeapi.so
>
>In other words, it is not if mod_ssl installed with Apache.
>It is if Apache was patched to use EAPI. So the mod_jk-eapi.so 
>is a correct
>name, and mod_jk-ssl.so is not, since mod_jk variant does not 
>depend on ssl
>presence in Apache.
>
>Jan 
>
>
>On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Michael Weissenbacher wrote:
>
>> >How many times I have answered to that ?
>> >eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
>> >noeapi for std apache 
>> 
>> so why not name mod_jk-eapi.so -> mod_jk-ssl.so?
>> 
>> michael
>> 
>
>Jan K. Labanowski            |    phone: 614-292-9279,  FAX: 
>614-292-7168
>Ohio Supercomputer Center    |    Internet: jkl@osc.edu 
>1224 Kinnear Rd,             |    http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
>Columbus, OH 43212-1163      |    http://www.osc.edu/
>