Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 40003 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2001 13:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 39952 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2001 13:31:43 -0000 Received: from rm-rstar.sfu.ca (root@142.58.120.21) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 13:31:43 -0000 Received: from cultus.sfu.ca (cultus.sfu.ca [142.58.101.5]) by rm-rstar.sfu.ca (8.10.1/8.10.1/SFU-5.0H) with ESMTP id f7ODVgp16443 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 06:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200108241331.f7ODVgp16443@rm-rstar.sfu.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org From: "Rob S." Organization: Student X-Sender: rslifka@popserver.sfu.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: "Rob S." Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 6:31:42 PDT X-Mailer: SFUwebmail 2.70 Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:43:50 +0200 tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org wrote: > i had the best results with the sun jdk 1.3.1 on windows and with ibm jdk > 1.3.0 for linux. on some linux machines the sun jdk wouldn't work at all... Not to defend it or anything =) but I've run it on suse, redhat, debian, and slackware. - r