Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9765 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2001 15:09:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9758 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2001 15:09:45 -0000 Received: from rm-rstar.sfu.ca (root@142.58.120.21) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 15:09:45 -0000 Received: from cultus.sfu.ca (cultus.sfu.ca [142.58.101.5]) by rm-rstar.sfu.ca (8.10.1/8.10.1/SFU-5.0H) with ESMTP id f7NF9ap00267 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 08:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200108231509.f7NF9ap00267@rm-rstar.sfu.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org From: "Rob S." Organization: Student X-Sender: rslifka@popserver.sfu.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: "Rob S." Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 8:09:36 PDT X-Mailer: SFUwebmail 2.70 Subject: Re: Mozilla and Tomcat X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Quick question now that I've got Mozilla setup and ready to run through some tests... what do you have Mozilla's caching set to, just so I can make sure I'm running the same way you are? - r On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:38:49 +0100 tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org wrote: > On Thursday 23 August 2001 15:14 pm, you wrote: > > I'd be glad to run the same test here. What version of Mozilla, Tomcat, > > setup, source code, etc.? > > > Well any jsp. Mozilla 0.9.3 or above (I am running a nightly but 0.9.3) > will do. Tomcat 4.0.b7 (and I think b6 was affected as well, but try b7). > Have reloadable=true in your context, view a jsp, change it, press reload. > It isn't a specific thing I do with a jsp, it's just Moz, tomcat and the > auto recompiling of jsps. I have to hammer the reload button until I get > the correct page. > > > > - r > > > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:28:55 +0100 tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org wrote: > > > So readers, can I assume noone has anything useful to add to why Tomcat > > > produces: > > > > > > for no apparent reason? > > > > > > On Wednesday 22 August 2001 14:42 pm, you wrote: > > > > 4.0b7 works fine for me. You might want to try it with the example > > > > jsps. Try this, > > > > > > > > 1. Add the following lines to the top of one of the examples (i.e. > > > > Snoop) > > > > > > > > response.setHeader("Pragma", "No-cache"); > > > > response.setDateHeader("Expires", 0); > > > > response.setHeader("Cache-Control", "no-cache"); > > > > > > > > 2. Clear your browser cache > > > > > > > > 3. Test the example and see whether you are still having the > issue. > > > > I have used netscape and ie successfully against Tomcat 4.0b7 without > > > > > > seeing > this type of problem. > > > > > > > ____________________Reply Separator____________________ > > > > Subject: Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat > > > > Author: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org > > > > Date: 8/22/2001 1:23 PM > > > > > > > > On Wednesday 22 August 2001 00:38 am, you wrote: > > > > > It sounds like a problem in your jsp or servlet. > > > > > > > > > > It looks like your response is not being truncated, since you get > > > > > your tag. Make sure to flush the output stream before > closing > > > > it in servlets. Also, you might want to check whether you > are using > > > > page.forward since this will replace the response with > the forwarded > > > > > page > > response. Without seeing your servlet or jsp, It's difficult > to > > help > > further. > > > > > > > No, it's not. The jsp/servlets are fine. It's only when tomcat > rebuilds > > > > > the > jsp class from the jsp page when it changes. After a few > refreshes, > > it > works, and then works for good (until I change it). > > > > > > > > What version of Tomcat are you running. You should be running > either > > > > 3.2.3 if you are using the 3.2 branch, some version of 3.3, > or 4.0b7 > > > > which would be best. > > > > > > > > 4.0beta7 > > > > > > > > > ____________________Reply Separator____________________ > > > > > Subject: Re: Re[2]: Mozilla and Tomcat > > > > > Author: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org > > > > > Date: 8/21/2001 11:45 PM > > > > > > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > > > We're getting off topic here. I have caching turned offf, however > why > > > > would mozilla print when the JSP > page > > > > doesnt produce that (well it does, but with a load of other > stuff in > > > > there!). > > > > > > I > > can understand it caching pages, but not a page that has never > been > > > > > > > produced. > > > > > > > > > > Tomcat must be doing something odd. Perhaps it is indeed returning > > > > > > just: > > > > > > > > > > when it's rebuilt a page recently? > > > > > > > > > > I dunno, but it's a server problem not a caching problem IMHO. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday 21 August 2001 23:28 pm, you wrote: > > > > > > You can force the response to not be cached by the browser and > > > > > > proxy servers by setting headers in your jsp response before > > > > > > writing your html response header. Make sure to explicitly clear > > > > > > your browser > > > > > > cache > > > once after doing this to get rid of any latent cached > pages. > > > > > > > > response.setHeader("Pragma", "No-cache"); > > > > > > response.setDateHeader("Expires", 0); > > > > > > response.setHeader("Cache-Control", "no-cache"); > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________Reply Separator____________________ > > > > > > Subject: Re: Mozilla and Tomcat > > > > > > Author: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org > > > > > > Date: 8/21/2001 1:55 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > At 01:50 PM 8/21/2001, you wrote: > > > > > > >I've ran into similar problems with Internet Explorer. Not > exactly > > > > > > though. Basically, I've seen IE display a cached page, > even if > > > > > > you have caching turned off. What I do is completely > exit and > > > > > > restart > > > > > > my > > > > browser each time I test a change to a servlet. > > > > > > > > > Yeah, IE has a wicked sticky cache. > > > > > > -- > > > John Baker, BSc CS. > > > Java Developer, TEAM Slb. (http://www.teamenergy.com/) > > > The views expressed in this mail are my own. > > -- > John Baker, BSc CS. > Java Developer, TEAM Slb. (http://www.teamenergy.com/) > The views expressed in this mail are my own.