tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Curtis Dougherty <curtis_doughe...@businessthreads.com>
Subject RE: Beyond Tomcat 4..?
Date Wed, 01 Aug 2001 18:30:53 GMT

YES... integration with IIS5 and Win2K...  

Documentation for same... 

:P
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 1:18 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Beyond Tomcat 4..?




On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, chris brown wrote:

> Just wondering what's being planned for the future of Tomcat beyond the
4.0
> release (if anyone knows...).  For example, are there plans to make a
> release that uses JDK 1.4's "scalable I/O" features?  (as both products
are
> currently in beta, I imagine that could be some way off!)
> 

Experimenting with the "new I/O" calls is certainly something I'm
interested in exploring (along with performance tuning in general).  But
the reality is that what actually gets added post-4.0 is based on what
features people suggest, combined with what features people actually write
code for.

Are there particular things you're interested in seeing?

Craig McClanahan


> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <craigmcc@apache.org>
> To: <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 11:35 PM
> Subject: RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3
> 
> 
> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Bryan Rood wrote:
> >
> > > Pier,
> > >
> > > I am interested in using a 4.0.something tomcat build.
> > >
> > > Are there official sources at apache that can confirm the
"VERY_stable"
> > > declaration that you have made?
> > > My company won't let me use anything but a stable production release.
> > > Is the 4.0 the same as prod quality?
> > > thanks so much,
> > >
> >
> > I'm one of the primary authors of Tomcat 4.0, so I've got some thoughts
> > about this (and undoubtedly some bias as well :-).
> >
> > The only reason that 4.0 has not been declared final yet is that the
> > underlying specifications it is based on (Servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2) are
not
> > yet final.  In fact, small changes and clarifications are still going
on,
> > and it would be pretty silly to declare 4.0 "final" and then have to go
> > change it because the specs changed underneath.
> >
> > There will shortly be a "beta 7" release, to pick up the most recent
> > specification-related changes.  It should be considered a "release
> > candidate", and development efforts between now and release day will be
> > focused on bug fixes (at the moment, there are very few bugs recorded
> > against Tomcat 4 in the bug tracking system at
> > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/>) and improved documentation.
> >
> > Craig McClanahan
> >
> >
> >
> > > Bryan
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pier P. Fumagalli [mailto:pier@betaversion.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 9:33 AM
> > > To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3
> > >
> > >
> > > Andrew Cooke at andrew@intertrader.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't want to use 4.0 as it's beta.
> > >
> > > Don't worry about being a beta... It's stable, _VERY_ stable.
> > >
> > >     Pier
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message