Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 78355 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2001 16:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 78348 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2001 16:59:12 -0000 Received: from unter.loudeye.com (216.10.241.2) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 20 Jul 2001 16:59:12 -0000 Received: from tsexch01.int.loudeye.com (cerberus.loudeye.com [209.221.170.2]) by unter.loudeye.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f6KGvr820039 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by tsexch01.int.loudeye.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3TKMTJ26>; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:57:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jann VanOver To: "'tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Win2K security Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:57:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N All of us? -----Original Message----- From: Gabriel Weinberg [mailto:gweinberg@ves.mass.edu] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 7:09 PM To: Tomcat-User (E-mail); Ronnie Millar (E-mail) Subject: Win2K security I think that we should implement a higher standard of security in our Win2K production environment, much along the lines of Matt's proposal. Any objections? If no, I will think about and propose a system for patch and password management as well as make other changes like encrypt PC Anywhere and change the name of the Administrator accounts. Gabriel