Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 80325 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2001 02:10:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 80318 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2001 02:10:36 -0000 Received: from fe1.rdc-kc.rr.com (HELO mail1.kc.rr.com) (24.94.163.48) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 27 Jul 2001 02:10:36 -0000 Received: from THDV001 ([65.26.87.176]) by mail1.kc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Thu, 26 Jul 2001 21:10:43 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Tia Haenni" To: Subject: RE: Upgrading tomcat Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 21:12:41 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Well, then, what am I waiting for? Thanks for the input. Tia -----Original Message----- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 6:53 PM To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Upgrading tomcat On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Charles Baker wrote: > Another question, do apps developed under the 3.2.x ( > jsp 1.1/servlet 2.2 ) work well with Tomcat 4.0 and > the newer servlet/jsp specs? > The servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2 specs *require* backwards compatibility, even to the point of requiring 2.3/1.2 containers to recognize valid 2.2/1.1 deployment descriptors and tag libraries. In addition, no non-backwards-compatible API changes were made. Therefore, as long as your app does not rely on: * Non-spec features of Tomcat 3.2 that are different in Tomcat 4.0. * Areas where the 2.2/1.1 specs were silent and the 2.3/1.2 specs have created some specific behavior that is different than what Tomcat 3.2 did. * Bugs in Tomcat 3.2. then you should be fine. In practice, I have found *very* few cases where I bumped into any of these issues. Just as one simple example of this, all of the web applications shipped with Struts run just fine under both 3.2 and 4.0. Craig McClanahan