Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 39738 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2001 22:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 39592 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2001 22:26:10 -0000 Received: from front2.mail.megapathdsl.net (66.80.60.30) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 3 Jul 2001 22:26:10 -0000 Received: from [216.36.75.57] (HELO xythos-tim.xythos.com) by front2.mail.megapathdsl.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.8) with ESMTP id 1655671 for tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2001 15:22:40 -0700 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010703152516.00b52b20@mail.xythos.com> X-Sender: tim@mail.xythos.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 15:25:44 -0700 To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org From: Tim O'Neil Subject: Re: Does Tomcat needs jdk 1.2.2 In-Reply-To: <3B424469.4D1B7B4D@flashman.com> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010703085511.00b328c0@mail.xythos.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010703144624.00b328c0@mail.xythos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 03:17 PM 7/3/2001, you wrote: >Believe me, we never give anything away! Right. Making your point pointless. Why don't people believe in making sense anymore?