tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From pete <p...@claudia.dyn.dhs.org>
Subject Re: AGAIN: Does Apache worth it?
Date Mon, 02 Jul 2001 22:39:07 GMT
Couldn't say when it gets updated, since i subscribed to the list i 
don't have much need to go there any more :)

-Pete

> Thanks Pete,
> 
> Does the archive is updated every day?
> 
> Eitan
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pete [mailto:pete@claudia.dyn.dhs.org]
>> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 12:10 PM
>> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: AGAIN: Does Apache worth it?
>> 
>> 
>> I find Apache with Tomcat to feel noticeably faster. I have 
>> no pure HTML 
>> pages at all, just JSPs calling backend classes.
>> 
>> This is simply due to the fact that Apache serves images 
>> faster, i would 
>> think.
>> 
>> Since my pages contain, on average at least 5 static 
>> GIFs/JPGs, this is 
>> a lot fewer requests for tomcat to process.
>> 
>> I recommend Apache/Tomcat integration for any production 
>> setup, though 
>> standalone tomcat will perform just fine during the 
>> development process.
>> 
>> Also, if you have missed traffic on the list, why not check 
>> the archives 
>> on jakarta.apache.org instead of reposting?
>> 
>> -Pete
>> 
>>> Hi Todd,
>>> 
>>> Can you please give me some feeling concerning the 
>> 
>> performance improvement?
>> 
>>> Hoe much faster is Apache then Tomcat?
>>> What about the number of concurrent users? Is this an issue?
>>> 
>>> Did you find any differences concerning the stability?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Eitan
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Todd Sussman [mailto:todds@careonnet.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 11:05 AM
>>>> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
>>>> Subject: RE: AGAIN: Does Apache worth it?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> We have a similar situation.  Our product is almost completly 
>>>> JSP's with
>>>> about 6 html pages.  We have found that the web server 
>>> 
>> included with
>> 
>>>> tomcat was just too slow and we get much better 
>>> 
>> performance with the
>> 
>>>> Apache/Tomcat setup.
>>>> 
>>>> Just my 2 cents worth.
>>>> 
>>>> Todd
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Eitan Ben Noach [mailto:EitanB@proficiency.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 10:59 AM
>>>> To: 'tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org'
>>>> Subject: AGAIN: Does Apache worth it?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  Hello all,
>>>> 
>>>> I'm sending this question again, since my mail system crashed and I
>>>> didn't
>>>> get any of your answers ( if any ).
>>>> 
>>>> If you already posted any idea concerning this issue to 
>>> 
>> this mailing
>> 
>>>> list, I
>>>> will appreciate if you will post it again.
>>>> 
>>>> Here is the original message:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> We are intending to use Apache & Tomcat as web server in 
>>>> 
>>>> our product,
>>>> 
>>>>> and preliminary experiments show excellent performance.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Most of our web pages are JSPs and servlets, and few 
>>>> 
>> HTMLs and Gifs.
>> 
>>>>> We wonder what is the contribution of Apache in our scenario 
>>>>> - some of us 
>>>>> think that Tomcat standalone is enough.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is there any advantage of using Apache and not Tomcat standalone?
>>>>> 
>>>>> We will appreciate any contributing input.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -----------------------------
>>>>> Eitan Ben-Noach
>>>>> Proficiency, Ltd.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tel: +972.2.548.0287
>>>>> Fax: +972.2.586.3871
>>>>> email: eitanb@proficiency.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Intelligence in Engineering Supply Chain Collaboration
>>>>> <http://www.proficiency.com/>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 



Mime
View raw message