Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 31357 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2001 19:04:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 31350 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2001 19:04:22 -0000 Received: from snowbird.megapath.net (HELO megapathdsl.net) (216.200.176.7) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 16 Apr 2001 19:04:22 -0000 Received: from [216.36.75.57] (HELO XYTHOS-TIM.xythos.com) by megapathdsl.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.3) with ESMTP id 19549929 for tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:03:48 -0700 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010416120040.033971b0@www.xythos.com> X-Sender: tim@www.xythos.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:02:15 -0700 To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org From: Tim O'Neil Subject: Re: Asking for an Opionio on Apache & Tomcat or Just Apache In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 02:27 PM 4/16/2001 -0400, you wrote: >Please take a time to provide me with the following opinion. I spend some >time configuring Tomcat and Apache. Because of deadline constaints and the >fact that some allready developed code has been devloped using only Tomcat >as standalone, the prototype team is focusing on just using Tomcat. Does >anybody know if that approach is good? Personally I feel very reluctant in >following that approach, but I have to convence by team leader why Tomcat by >itself won't do the same work as Apache & Tomcat together will. > >Any opinions are wellcome That would be insane. Just an opinion. Keep using Apache. Once you get basics of configuring TC/Apache down its not that bad. Sure, there's a learning curve, but I think it would be a mistake to run an enterprise on TC alone.