Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 91872 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2001 19:31:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 91862 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2001 19:31:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO radserver.blackhammer.com) (209.208.157.54) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 5 Apr 2001 19:31:52 -0000 Received: from blackhammer.com (unverified [192.168.0.75]) by radserver.blackhammer.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 3.4.2) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:31:47 -0400 Sender: pete Message-ID: <3ACCC760.AA4B10B8@blackhammer.com> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 15:28:32 -0400 From: Pete Wright Organization: blackhammer productions X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: java process question References: <3ACCC4D4.92A85B6F@blackhammer.com> <20010405202501.H27639@multicert.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2457FE3DE6C0F0535583A916" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N --------------2457FE3DE6C0F0535583A916 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit yea i thought they were threads. i suppose my question was if all 47 were necc. and if not could i lower the amount of them. pete "Rui M . Silva Seabra" wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:17:40PM -0400, Pete Wright wrote: > > this is for a development machine that's pretty > > underpowered so obviously i'd love the conserve resources. should i > > even worry about all that java stuff? > > I think they're threads, but if you have low power machines, mayhap you should not use servlets at all? > > Yours, rms > > -- > + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown > + Whatever you do will be insignificant, > | but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi > + So let's do it...? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature -- Pete Wright Systems Administrator Black Hammer Productions pete@blackhammer.com wk: 212.625.8980 x23 cell: 917.415.9866 --------------2457FE3DE6C0F0535583A916 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit yea i thought they were threads.  i suppose my question was if all 47 were necc. and if not could i lower the amount of them.
pete

"Rui M . Silva Seabra" wrote:

On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:17:40PM -0400, Pete Wright wrote:
> this is for a development machine that's pretty
> underpowered so obviously i'd love the conserve resources.  should i
> even worry about all that java stuff?

I think they're threads, but if you have low power machines, mayhap you should not use servlets at all?

Yours, rms

--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi
+ So let's do it...?

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature

-- 
Pete Wright
Systems Administrator
Black Hammer Productions

pete@blackhammer.com
wk: 212.625.8980 x23
cell: 917.415.9866
  --------------2457FE3DE6C0F0535583A916--