tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ellis Teer <e_t...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: AddModule mod_jk.c
Date Mon, 16 Apr 2001 19:14:58 GMT
Thanks Jeff and guyr,

Can I rename the current mod_jk.dll to mod_jk.so?  Are they identical and it's
just a name extension change that occurred between 1.3.14 and 1.3.15.  I
checked the downloads of Jakarta and Apache.org and didn't find a mod_jk.so
binary for Win2k.

-Ellis Teer

On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 10:12:31 -0700, Jeff Kilbride wrote:
> RE: AddModule mod_jk.c      I believe they changed the extensions
>from .dll to  ..so in Apache 1.3.15 and up.
>  
> --jeff
>  
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From:    guyr@zephion.net
>  To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache..org
>  Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 9:16  AM
>  Subject: RE: AddModule mod_jk.c
>
>
>
>
>Windows doesn't require DLLs to have a .dll extension.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:    e_teer [mailto:e_teer@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 4:21 PM
>To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache..org
>Subject: Re: AddModule mod_jk.c
>
>
>Hey Eric,
>
>LoadModule loads the module into memory and AddModule makes it
>available for use.  You do need both except when    the module is
>already built into Apache which several    are in the Win32 version,
>in
>this case you only need    the AddModule.
>
>However, it was my understanding that .so files are Linux    only. 
>And
>all the modules for Win32 use .dll    libraries.  Therefore the
>LoadModule command had    to operate on module/filenames with .dll. 
>
>
>But the config file for Win32 in version 1.3.19 now has all    .so
>endings.  Just to restate things for other    readers I am wondering
>if
>that was an error/bug or if    Apache 1.3.19 now does some internal
>filename    translation so everything can be uniformly called .so
>even
>though you are supposed to use .dll on Win32.
>
>-Ellis Teer
>
>On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 00:10:03 -0700 (PDT), eric leung    wrote:
>>thanks jeff,
>>i    had read this already, but i am still not very clear
>>about difference between the 2.
>>
>>what i think is addmodule will add the module to    the
>>list. you can't use the module until you use    the
>>LoadModule command to load the module into    memeory.
>>you don't need to use AddModule before    loading it.
>>
>>would    AddModule become pretty much useless?
>>
>>thanks.
>>
>>--- Jeff Kilbride <jeff@kilbride.com> wrote:
>>> Did you try the docs?
>>>
>>> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html#addmodule
>>>
>>>
>>http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_so.html#loadmodule
>>>
>>> --jeff
>>>
>>> ----- Original    Message -----
>>> From: "brian luk"    <chiu01us@yahoo.com>
>>> To:    <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
>>> Sent:    Saturday, April 14, 2001 2:16 PM
>>> Subject:    AddModule mod_jk.c
>>>
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> > can any one tell me what's difference between the
>>> 2:
>>> >
>>> > LoadModule    jk_module             libexec/mod_jk.so
>>> > AddModule    mod_jk.c
>>> >
>>> > i must load the jk module before i can connect to
>>> > tomcat.  I think tomcat works without    AddModule
>>> > mod_jk.c, what's AddModule    mod_jk.c use for? No
>>> use?
>>> >
>>> > thanks.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > P.S.
>>> > part    of the httpd.conf
>>> > LoadModule    env_module            libexec/mod_env.so
>>> > LoadModule    config_log_module
>>> >  libexec/mod_log_config.so
>>> > LoadModule    mime_module           libexec/mod_mime.so
>>> > LoadModule    negotiation_module
>>> >  libexec/mod_negotiation.so
>>> > LoadModule    status_module
>>> libexec/mod_status.so
>>> > LoadModule includes_module
>>> libexec/mod_include.so
>>> >  LoadModule autoindex_module
>>>  libexec/mod_autoindex.so
>>> > LoadModule    dir_module            libexec/mod_dir.so
>>> > LoadModule    cgi_module            libexec/mod_cgi.so
>>> > LoadModule    asis_module           libexec/mod_asis.so
>>> > LoadModule    imap_module           libexec/mod_imap.so
>>> > LoadModule    action_module
>>> libexec/mod_actions.so
>>> > LoadModule userdir_module
>>> libexec/mod_userdir.so
>>> >  LoadModule alias_module          libexec/mod_alias.so
>>> > LoadModule    access_module
>>> libexec/mod_access.so
>>> > LoadModule    auth_module           libexec/mod_auth.so
>>> > LoadModule    setenvif_module
>>>  libexec/mod_setenvif.so
>>> > LoadModule    jk_module             libexec/mod_jk.so
>>> > LoadModule    rewrite_module
>>> libexec/mod_rewrite.so
>>> > <IfDefine SSL>
>>> > LoadModule    ssl_module            libexec/libssl.so
>>> >  </IfDefine>
>>> >
>>> > ClearModuleList
>>> >  AddModule mod_env.c
>>> > AddModule    mod_log_config.c
>>> > AddModule    mod_mime.c
>>> > AddModule    mod_negotiation.c
>>> > AddModule    mod_status.c
>>> > AddModule    mod_include.c
>>> > AddModule    mod_autoindex.c
>>> > AddModule    mod_dir.c
>>> > AddModule mod_cgi.c
>>> > AddModule mod_asis.c
>>> > AddModule mod_imap.c
>>>  > AddModule mod_actions.c
>>> > AddModule    mod_userdir.c
>>> > AddModule    mod_alias.c
>>> > AddModule    mod_access.c
>>> > AddModule mod_auth.c
>>> > AddModule mod_so.c
>>> > AddModule mod_setenvif.c
>>>  > AddModule mod_jk.c
>>> > AddModule    mod_rewrite.c
>>> > <IfDefine    SSL>
>>> > AddModule mod_ssl.c
>>> > </IfDefine>
>>> >
>>> >  __________________________________________________
>>> > Do You Yahoo!?
>>> > Get    email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
>>>  > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Get email at your own    domain with Yahoo! Mail.
>>http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>
>-- e_teer, e_teer@yahoo.com on 04/15/2001
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free    @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

Mime
View raw message