tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeff Kilbride" <j...@kilbride.com>
Subject Re: Is mod_jk.so corrupt?
Date Tue, 24 Apr 2001 01:11:41 GMT
Hi John,

Yes, several people have had problems. The easiest course of action is to
download the Tomcat sources and compile your own mod_jk.so. It's pretty
straightforward. After you download the source, cd to the top level source
directory. Then do the following:

cd /src/native/apache1.3  (assuming you're using 1.3.x)
cp Makefile.linux Makefile
make

It took about 2 minutes to compile on my machine Then copy the new mod_jk.so
to your apache libexec/ directory. This worked for me.

Thanks,
--jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Hebert" <john@vedalabs.com>
To: <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 5:50 PM
Subject: Is mod_jk.so corrupt?


> I believe that the file
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1/bin/linux/i38
6/mod_jk.so
> might be corrupt. I didn't think so at first and suspected that it was
something I was doing wrong,
> but I've downloaded the file a few times and would only get the error:
>
> [root@webserver bin]# ./apachectl start
> Syntax error on line 8 of /usr/local/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto:
> API module structure `jk_module' in file
/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an
Apache module DSO?
> ./apachectl start: httpd could not be started
>
> I saw Henri Gomez's announcement about the Tomcat v3.2.2-beta-3 version
being available as well as the
>
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/tomcat/release/v3.2.2-beta-3/bin/linux/i386
/mod_jk-stdapi.so, so I
> tried that instead and httpd started.
>
> Has anybody else had problems getting
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1/bin/linux/i38
6/mod_jk.so
> to work?
>
> --
> John Hebert
> System Engineer
> http://www.vedalabs.com
> Changing your state of mind through sound.
>


Mime
View raw message