tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeff Kilbride" <j...@kilbride.com>
Subject Re: mod_jk advice
Date Mon, 16 Apr 2001 02:01:41 GMT
What's amazing is that there are no links to these on the website. How are
people supposed to find them?

--jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <hgomez@slib.fr>
To: <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 4:24 PM
Subject: RE: mod_jk advice


> It's amazing to see that RPM works is still not known ...
>
> For example in 3.3 tree
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3-m2/rpms/
>
> PS: Redhat Linux 6.2 + updates. (rpm -qpi --changelog
> tomcat-mod-3.3-m2.1.i386.rpm)
>
> -
> Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
> EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Tim O'Neil [mailto:tim@xythos.com]
> >Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 6:52 PM
> >To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: mod_jk advice
> >
> >
> >At 09:27 AM 4/13/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> >>It would be nice if they published what version of
> >Linux/Apache/Tomcat the
> >>available binary was compiled for. I think it's pretty
> >confusing for new
> >>users when you say "Hey, here's a binary", but they don't
> >understand all the
> >>reasons why it won't work with their platform. It's such an
> >easy process to
> >>compile your own -- especially with the Makefile's provided.
> >Maybe they
> >>should just get rid of the binary and distribute the mod_jk
> >source with
> >>every Tomcat distribution. Is that feasible?
> >
> >
> >I would think distributing the source would be
> >much easier than distributing binaries. They
> >could even distribute the source as a Linux-
> >style RPM, for those who prefer that platform,
> >sure.
> >
> >
>


Mime
View raw message