tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeff Kilbride" <j...@kilbride.com>
Subject Re: mod_jk - DEAD END! [POSTSCRIPT]
Date Fri, 20 Apr 2001 04:36:20 GMT
That's funny, because I was running RH6.2 with Apache 1.3.19 from source.
All I did was go to the directory where I installed the Jakarta sources and
then to src/native/apache1.3/. I copied Makefile.linux to Makefile, and then
typed "make" from the command prompt. About 2 minutes later, I had my own
compiled version of mod_jk.so. I didn't have to enter any apxs commands
manually, the Makefile took care of it for me.

Thanks,
--jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rui M . Silva Seabra" <rms@multicert.com>
To: <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:01 AM
Subject: Re: mod_jk - DEAD END! [POSTSCRIPT]


> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:25:23AM -0700, Jeff Kilbride wrote:
> > Forgive the expression, but bullshit. :)
> > The mod_jk compilation *is* trivial and since they don't list on the
website
>
> In the web page:
>
> For Linux:
> apxs -o
mod_jk.so -I../jk -I/usr/local/jdk/include -I/usr/local/jdk/include/linux -c
*.c ../jk/*.c
>
> Your build may fail because the object files from the ../jk directory have
been compiled to the current directory, rather than their source directory.
>
> Running gcc -shared -o mod_jk.so *.o should finish the build.
>
> Now, this did not work with my system, a RH 6.2 with apache installed from
source.
>
> Yes, with DSO enabled.
>
> The exact error is far away from my mind. I don't care anymore :)
>
>
> > what version of Apache or Linux the binary is compiled for, it's pretty
much
> > useless. I'd say the number one problem post I have seen since joining
this
>
> It worked perfectly in RH 6.2 and RH 7.0. I'm willing to bet that it will
work on many more.
>
> > list relates to the fact that the binary doesn't work on most people's
> > systems. If you give somebody with relatively little experience a binary
> > that's supposed to work and it doesn't, it only confuses the matter that
> > much more.
>
> No.. usually binaries are not a good solution.
>
> > By the way, I'd be interested in hearing what your config is, since it
> > worked for you.
>
> I don't think the hardware would be an issue, then:
>
>   RH 6.2 (with official upgrades), apache 1.3.14 initially, but it has
worked ever since.
>
> There's nothing more to it! :)
>
> hugs, rms
>
> --
> + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
> + Whatever you do will be insignificant,
> | but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi
> + So let's do it...?
>


Mime
View raw message