tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Buroff" <>
Subject RE: tomcat, apache, and mod_jk
Date Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:26:45 GMT
Thanks much, that worked fine.
The reason I thought I needed a .so
(even though I realize that's a Unix "shared object"
and windows use dll's (dynamic linked objects) is
that all of the files in Apaches modules directory
were .so. I turned a couple on (uncommented the
LoadModules's) just to see and apache started with
no problems. Do you happen to understand that?
Everything is working now. I'm just asking this for
my own edification. Thanks very much for your help.


-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Fowler []
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 9:09 PM
Subject: RE: tomcat, apache, and mod_jk


Nah, you don't need the .so, just mod_jk.dll.

You can get it from:-

Read the documentation at:-

And where it mentions just replace with mod_jk.dll and it'll work
fine. *cringe*

Hope that helps+works. The documentation is a bit misleading on the subject
of win32 platforms.


Adam Fowler
Second year Computer Science undergraduate
University of Wales, Aberystwyth
Carroll College, WI, USA(2000-2001)
"Every new beginning comes from some other beginning's end"

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Buroff []
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 1:11 PM
To: tomcatUser
Cc: Buroff, Steven
Subject: tomcat, apache, and mod_jk

I'm running Apache 1.3.17 and tomcat 3.2.1 on NT 4.0
I'm trying to use mod_jk. Apparently I need a
even though this is NT. At least, all the files in apache's
modules directory are Does anyone know where
I can get the correct for this combination of
Apache and tomcat? I need the binary, I'm not set up to
build it. Thanks much.

Steve Buroff

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, email:

View raw message