tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martino, Karl" <...@staff.philly.com>
Subject RE: Linux->NT->MSsqlServer
Date Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:43:06 GMT
We are using JTurbo with our Cofax content management system delivering 17
newspapers to the net, amoungst which is the Philadelphia Inquirer and
Tallahasse Democrat.

-Karl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: G.Nagarajan [mailto:gnagarajan@dkf.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 12:30 PM
> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Linux->NT->MSsqlServer
> 
> 
> Yes, the atinav driver forces you to use a single statement 
> throughout a
> transaction.
> And in the freeTDS driver, the transaction is connected with 
> the statement.
> 
> How about these type 3 drivers from Merant and others. Has 
> anyone worked
> with them?
> I did not try them for two reasons. Adding another 
> intermediate layer and
> making
> things complicated and to avoid one more source of possible errors.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Goss [mailto:mgoss@rtci.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 6:11 PM
> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Re: linux->NT->MSsqlServer
> 
> 
> Ditto...
> I'm also using the JTurbo 2.0 JDBC driver, and on benchmark 
> tests against
> Bea's
> Weblogic JDBC driver, it came up 5 times faster!
> Matt
> 
> Eric Hartmann wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've test two drivers JDBC for Microsoft SQL Server 7 / 
> 2000. jdbcKona
> > driver from BEA (does not works with SQL 2000) and JTurbo 
> from Ashna.
> JTurbo
> > 2.0 (www.jturbo.com) is a very good driver for SQL Server. 
> It's fast and
> > reliable with my tests. I didn't test it on Linux but you 
> can download a
> > test version for 30j and limited to 5 connections. It seems 
> that JTurbo is
> > more reliable than jdbcKona. But this two level 4 drivers 
> are good however
> > we choose JTurbo that seems to be faster.
> >
> > I hope this helps
> >
> > Eric
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message