tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From tra...@thinkvirtual.com
Subject RE: RE: RE: Re: Is Tomcat 3.1 Production capable???
Date Sun, 24 Sep 2000 22:38:08 GMT
Not too sure.  I haven't noticed any significant speed difference.  

Travis

---- Original Message ----
From: Paulo Gaspar <paulo.gaspar@krankikom.de>
Sent: 2000-09-23 11:47:26.0
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: RE: RE: Re: Is Tomcat 3.1 Production capable???

Isn't JRun+IIS slower too?
(Very clearly in file uploads, I found.)

Paulo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: travis@thinkvirtual.com [mailto:travis@thinkvirtual.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 19:33
> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: RE: RE: Re: Is Tomcat 3.1 Production capable???
> 
> 
> Win2k has been pretty solid all in all.  No other sites we are 
> serving are having issues, ones using asp or cfm are all fine.  
> 
> As for win2k, it's much better that NT was for stability (only 
> have to reboot like once a week now!  ;-)
> 
> So it's gotta be tomcat that's failing.  I couldn't stand it 
> anymore so last night I got the eval version of jrun 3 and all 
> problems were solved after a bit of configuration.  pretty solid 
> product.  But it's the price difference that hurts.  
> 
> Travis


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message