Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 34509 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2000 06:23:40 -0000 Received: from pixel.elseweb.com (HELO webcollage.com) (199.203.179.226) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2000 06:23:40 -0000 Received: from athena.elseweb.com (athena [192.168.1.30]) by webcollage.com (8.9.3+Sun/6.2.1) with ESMTP id IAA12629 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 08:26:59 +0200 (IST) Received: by mail.israel.elseweb.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <3NNHZZ7F>; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 09:23:08 +0300 Message-ID: From: Amos Shapira To: "'tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Java performance: Sun 1.3 vs. IBM 1.1.8 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 09:23:08 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, No personal experience with either here, but just be aware that, as far as I last saw, there is also an IBM 1.3 version which you might want to look at. It went out at least a few weeks before Sun's 1.3 for Linux. Hope this helps, --Amos Shapira WebCollage > -----Original Message----- > From: walshag [mailto:walshag@bc.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 10:32 PM > To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Java performance: Sun 1.3 vs. IBM 1.1.8 > > > Hello everyone, > > I'm preparing to deploy a current version of Tomcat for a > Boston College > system later this month, and wonder if anyone has experience > with both Sun's > 1.3 JDK and IBM's 1.1.8 JDK? In particular, I am curious if > the HotSpot VM > w/Sun's 1.3 narrows the performance gap making it comparable > (or faster?) than > IBM's 1.1.8 implmentation? > > We're planning to deploy our Java servlets under Tomcat for > Linux (current > rev. of RedHat). > > Any recommendations or observations that you might have > regarding a Java > implementation would be greatly appreciated. > > With regards, > Aaron Walsh > >