Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 63449 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2000 19:30:53 -0000 Received: from mercury.sun.com (192.9.25.1) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2000 19:30:53 -0000 Received: from shorter.eng.sun.com ([129.144.250.35]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16447 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eng.sun.com (d-ucup02-251-235 [129.144.251.235]) by shorter.eng.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v1.7) with ESMTP id MAA07466 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3936B9C2.F142D293@eng.sun.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 12:30:10 -0700 From: Eduardo Pelegri--Llopart X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: L&F/Logic (was Re: server side include tag support in Tomcat?) References: <031124ACED5ED311BDD50000C0F0620098F1CB@cismail.creativeis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I don't want to start a long (or short) debate thread but I want to try to clarify something. > Actually, if I were to do something like jsp, I would use Enhydra. > This separates the look and feel from the actual business logic. > > Jake I find it useful to consider two different statements: (A) JSP 1.1 does not allow separation of Look and Feel from Business Logic and (B) JSP 1.1 does not enforce separation of Look and Feel from Business Logic (A) is, IMHO, false. For an example close to "home", see struts @ jakarta. (B) is true. - eduard/o