Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 6400 invoked from network); 23 May 2000 16:45:21 -0000 Received: from ruby32.pageplus.com (HELO georgia.rubysolutions.com) (root@206.168.42.32) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 May 2000 16:45:21 -0000 Received: from rubysolutions.com ([198.77.205.64]) by georgia.rubysolutions.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA12287 for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 10:46:13 -0600 Message-ID: <392AB607.505D10BB@rubysolutions.com> Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 10:47:03 -0600 From: Steve Ruby Organization: RubySolutions X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Jserv and Tomcat 3.1 performance comparison References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hochede Francois wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm currently trying to solve a choice problem : I need a servlet engine > with great performances and an open-source policy in order to port some > existing application which are currently running on Netscape Enterprise + > Jrun. > > Tomcat support Netscape and the servlet API (2.2) is the newest but Jserv > maybe have a more robust and more tuned performance capability (triggered by > a "longer" life in production environnement)... > > Anybody have suggests or comments on this point ? > > Francois > And there are also some features in Jserv that havne't been finshed or started in Tomcat, so make sure those features are not show-stoppers for you.