Return-Path: <meinholz@bmpcoe.org>
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 21378 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2000 17:50:26 -0000
Received: from nemesis.bmpcoe.org (204.255.194.70)
  by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2000 17:50:26 -0000
Received: from bmpcoe.org (aegir.bmpcoe.org [204.255.194.110]) by
 nemesis.bmpcoe.org with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
 Version 5.5.2650.21)
	id HCKXYAQV; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:49:18 -0500
Sender: meinholz
Message-ID: <38DBAB7E.CF102F9C@bmpcoe.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 12:53:02 -0500
From: "Lloyd H. Meinholz" <meinholz@bmpcoe.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: application web.xml question
References: <38DA81A4.C60850EE@bmpcoe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Is this bug 106 "named servlet dispatching is broken"? What is a named
servlet? Thanks,

Lloyd


"Lloyd H. Meinholz" wrote:
> 
> I am having difficulty getting <servlet-name> <servlet-class> working in
> my applications web.xml.
> 
> I have the following entry in the tomcat.conf file (included in
> httpd.conf):
> ApJServMount /blah /root
> 
> in my server.xml:
> <Context path="blah" docBase="/usr/www/site/webapps/blah" debug="0"
> reloadable="true">
> </Context>
> 
> in /usr/www/site/webapps/blah/WEB-INF/web.xml
> <web-app>
>    <display-name>Blah</display-name>
>    <servlet>
>       <servlet-name>Control</servlet-name>
>       <servlet-class>org.bmpcoe.action.framework.Control</servlet-class>
>    </servlet>
> </web-app>
> 
> I have left the default web.xml alone (the one in $TOMCAT_HOME/conf).
> 
> /blah/org.bmpcoe.action.framework.Control works but,
> /blah/Control doesn't. I've gone through the spec and the draft Users
> Guide and don't know if I've done something wrong or if this is a bug.
> Has anyone gotten functionality like this to work???