On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Kishi Mikio wrote:
> But, because expression language is available in "only" JSTL,
> it is inconvenience. Also, expression language has some problems.
The nightly build of the String taglib ought to work in an EL environment.
I can add the same feature to the Log taglib's nightly build.
Would be interesting to hear which taglibs you'd want EL-ized.
> So, I have considered the use of not "EL-based JSTL" but "RT-based JSTL"
> in "all JSP parts" .
> Has it made a mistake in this strategy ?
[Have?]
I don't think so. You're just using the JSTL in the same style as all
taglibs have been used before. Nothing wrong there.
> Is it better to use "EL-based JSTL" ?
I think it's an architectual rather than technical decision. JSP 2.0 will
be EL-ised by default [as far as I know] so by using the EL-based JSTL now
you might get better forward compatibility. Then again, turning off the EL
is just a config option in the web.xml so it won't be very hard.
[I'm slowly putting together the JSP 2.0 world in my mind, so I may be way
off]
Hen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:taglibs-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:taglibs-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
|