Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jessh@ptc.com designates
 12.11.148.84 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <52C1A354.8080508@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:46:12 -0600
From: Jess Holle <jessh@ptc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.50
References: 
 <CAFmzfTXLk0WJ+r=SFabx7LzzL2JPKphEtLxBEg4OYvvu8nQOfw@mail.gmail.com>
	<52B45D00.3080106@gmail.com>
 <CAFmzfTUXyFVm8+wXCa0WOvd8jWXaPgL_z+uu_DGnMiQHW5=-Cw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFmzfTUXyFVm8+wXCa0WOvd8jWXaPgL_z+uu_DGnMiQHW5=-Cw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="------------000803010101000209090600"

--------------000803010101000209090600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 12/21/2013 5:30 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> Hi Ognjen,
>
>
> 2013/12/20 Ognjen Blagojevic <ognjen.d.blagojevic@gmail.com>
>> Violeta,
>>
>> On 20.12.2013 13:52, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>>> The proposed 7.0.50 release is:
>>> [X] Broken - do not release
> Thanks for the testing.
> I'm still not convinced to stop the voting based on the frequency (1/5000)
> of the problem.

Equally important as the frequency of reproduction:

    Is this a regression from the last release?

In other words, can no such issue be produced with 7.0.47?

If not, then I don't see a reason to hold off on other fixes in 7.0.50.

If it appears to be a regression, however, /then /there's an argument to 
take this more seriously.

--
Jess Holle


--------------000803010101000209090600--