Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E6AB109DC for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96421 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2013 14:07:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 96302 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2013 14:07:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 96289 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2013 14:07:22 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:07:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.23.9]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username markt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:07:21 +0000 Message-ID: <52AF090D.7030306@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:07:09 +0000 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC7 References: <52A8F42B.4020201@apache.org> <52A8F509.3000901@apache.org> <000401cef8cb$7b70e990$7252bcb0$@apache.org> <000701cef8e2$58d403b0$0a7c0b10$@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <000701cef8e2$58d403b0$0a7c0b10$@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 14/12/2013 15:37, Konstantin Preißer wrote: > If more info is needed to debug the problem, please let me know. No more info needed at the moment. I can re-create the problem. The issues appear to be related to the changes I made to support non-blocking IO with AJP so they should be limited to Tomcat 8. Actually, I think there is more than one problem here. I've fixed the first issue in r1551211. With that fix I still see corrupted downloads but not the memory leak. I'm still looking into this. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org