Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47C281015B for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5865 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2013 13:57:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 5839 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2013 13:57:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 5822 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2013 13:57:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:57:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.25.134.21] (HELO mailout10.t-online.de) (194.25.134.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:57:22 +0000 Received: from fwd02.aul.t-online.de (fwd02.aul.t-online.de ) by mailout10.t-online.de with smtp id 1VJkui-0001Jp-Pj; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:57:01 +0200 Received: from NamePC (EXF-vkZfghcV5DDGyI+KQDXGLhaaU1F+uQVELu0MdM1p73FImk8j719LyVa7zN0wPz@[93.197.181.22]) by fwd02.t-online.de with esmtp id 1VJkuc-4WAdTk0; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:56:54 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Konstantin_Prei=C3=9Fer?= To: "'Tomcat Developers List'" References: <20130910192125.C71FD238899C@eris.apache.org> <522F906F.4090003@christopherschultz.net> In-Reply-To: <522F906F.4090003@christopherschultz.net> Subject: RE: svn commit: r1521594 [1/16] - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/ docs/images/ docs/stylesheets/ xdocs/images/ xdocs/stylesheets/ Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:56:47 +0200 Message-ID: <000901ceaef6$c2041b80$460c5280$@t-online.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQHvSAJ1vOZqcqjW8UvEFhkfadj8IQKtygXimWnrNnA= Content-Language: de X-ID: EXF-vkZfghcV5DDGyI+KQDXGLhaaU1F+uQVELu0MdM1p73FImk8j719LyVa7zN0wPz X-TOI-MSGID: 0a684f4b-c430-48f2-a408-50202e95f18c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Christopher, > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:chris@christopherschultz.net] > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:35 PM >=20 > It's amazing how a relatively small number of changes can take a page = from > 1996 to ... well, at least 2006. :) Do you mean the design or the markup? :) If you mean the design, I agree - I'm more a programmer than a designer = and just wanted to refresh the look of the site a bit - but there is = still a lot of room for improvement. ;) However, for improving the HTML markup, I orientated on current HTML5 = standards [1], like using the new HTML5 doctype (but due to the old XSLT = implementation, it has to be the "legacy-compat" one); using new tags = like header, main, footer, time and so on; using data-* attributes for = JS (and removing discouraged "document.write()"); not using HTML markup = for presentational purposes; etc. So from the markup side, it should = reflect the current HTML 5.1 (W3) spec from 2013. :) Regards, Konstantin Prei=C3=9Fer [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org