tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1521514 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Connector.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml webapps/docs/config/http.xml
Date Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:10:49 GMT
Mark,

On 9/10/13 11:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/09/2013 15:44, schultz@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: schultz
>> Date: Tue Sep 10 14:44:15 2013
>> New Revision: 1521514
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1521514
>> Log:
>> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54691
>>
>> Add configuration property "protocols" alias: "sslEnabledProtocols"
>> Document the as-yet-undocumented property (only documented sslEnabledProtocols, to
match Tomcat 7/8 documentation).
>>
>> Modified:
>>     tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Connector.java
>>     tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
>>     tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml
> 
> This is Tomcat 6 which is RTC not CTR. There should have been a proposal
> in the status file with 3 +1 votes before this was applied.

Yipes.

> Retrospectively, you have my +1.

Well. Shall I do things properly and revert the patch, make a proposal,
etc. or can I get a vote by acclimation and avoid the svn acrobatics?
I'm okay with reverting... I just wanted to avoid it if it didn't really
matter (code change is quite trivial after all) and the team was okay
with it.

Thanks,
-chris


Mime
View raw message