tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [taglibs] Site plans
Date Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:41:19 GMT
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:

> Apologize for delayed response.
>
> 2013/6/26 Jeremy Boynes <jboynes@apache.org>:
> > On Jun 25, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Help much appreciated - but do we want all the content of all the
> modules
> >> to be there?
> >>
> >> It feels to me that the website does not map directly to the codebase.
> We
> >> want an overall site, and subsites for Standard and for RDC. We don't
> want
> >> to have the 14 pom.xmls become a site structure, or the 4 pom.xmls
> >> (tld-generator and extended).
> >
> > Three mini-sites sounds good: a top-level one holding things together
> and then sub-sites for standard and RDC. Is there a way to associate the
> top-level one with the parent POM and the others with the "root" poms in
> standard and rdc? That would match with the things that are likely to be
> released (being all "standard" packages together, or all "rdc" packages
> together, but not both at the same time). Do we still need an aggregator
> pom as well - how about setting up separate CI jobs for "standard" and
> "rdc"?
> >
>
> Coud be possible but do you want to deploy sites from tagged modules
> versions ? (I presume yes).
> In such case that will changed a bit as all modules will be in a
> different svn path.
>


Apologies for no change on this - I've spent the week with flu.

I wouldn't expect to deploy the site from tags - a site is a live/current
thing.

Hen

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message