Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Sender: Jeremy Boynes <jeremy@boynes.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: [Bug 55102] New: Add ability to report time taken to prepare
 response
From: Jeremy Boynes <jboynes@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55102-78@https.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:22:50 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <00061128-0D63-4FD2-87A5-3B164147CC20@apache.org>
References: <bug-55102-78@https.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>

On Jun 15, 2013, at 10:09 AM, bugzilla@apache.org wrote:

> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D55102
>           Summary: Add ability to report time taken to prepare =
response
>=20
> Created attachment 30438
>  --> =
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D30438&action=3Dedit=

> Patch against trunk@r1493385 to record and output time to commit
>=20
> Tomcat's AccessLogValve is able to report the time taken to send an =
entire
> request using %D. This is the total processing time and may be =
affected by
> network conditions. It is sometimes useful to be able to record the =
time taken
> by the server to prepare the response and send the first content to =
the client.
>=20
> Attached is a patch that records the time the response is committed =
and then
> allows that to be reported in the access log using a '%F' pattern =
(which is the
> same as used by the mod-log-firstbyte module for HTTPD).

Any thoughts on this patch? Is it suitable for trunk, and if so should I =
commit it? Is this something worth back porting to 7.0?

Thanks
Jeremy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org