Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38729F4D8 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49191 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2013 09:53:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 48615 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2013 09:53:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 48577 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2013 09:53:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:53:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.115] (HELO eir.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.115) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:52:59 +0000 Received: by eir.zones.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 80) id B79C974F1; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:52:38 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: [Bug 54882] HttpServletRequest.getRequestURI() returns also fragment Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:52:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Tomcat 7 X-Bugzilla-Component: Servlet & JSP API X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: markt@apache.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@tomcat.apache.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54882 --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas --- Generally, Tomcat doesn't provide work-arounds for bugs in third-party software components unless all of the following conditions have been met: a) The issue affects a large proportion of the Tomcat user base b) The issue has a significant negative impact on users of affected applications c) An application level work-around is not viable d) The issue has been reported to the vendor of the third-party software e) The vendor of the third-party software has indicated that a fix will not be available for an extended period of time (many months) In this case my current view of the above is: a) Not demonstrated. Tomcat hasn't handled fragments for as long as I can remember. The only reference I can find in the archives was a query on the users list as to why the server wasn't seeing the fragment. b) Not demonstrated. c) A Filter could fix this. d) Not demonstrated. e) Not demonstrated. There have been cases where we have provided a work-around but they are few and far between. At the moment this bug is heading towards being closed as INVALID or maybe WONTFIX. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org