Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 747C3D0E8 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 18:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79811 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2013 18:42:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 79749 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2013 18:42:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 79739 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2013 18:42:57 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:42:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.23.9]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username markt, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:42:57 +0000 Message-ID: <510D5E28.3030905@apache.org> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:42:48 +0000 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [taglibs] TCK update References: <50694B65.9040904@apache.org> <510664FA.3000209@apache.org> <9FE66E15-2C71-4477-AF69-AA8958BBA9C4@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <9FE66E15-2C71-4477-AF69-AA8958BBA9C4@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/02/2013 18:37, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > On Jan 29, 2013, at 11:56 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: >> On Jan 28, 2013, at 3:46 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 26/01/2013 21:51, Henri Yandell wrote: > ... >>> >>> I've just checked the latest version of the TCK documentation for JSTL >>> 1.2 and while the TCK has been updated so it will run on Java 7, the >>> reference runtime remains Java 5. My interpretation of that is that the >>> TCK must pass when running with a Java 5 JRE. >> >> My interpretation was that a product must pass the TCK in all its configurations. In other words, you can't claim compatibility on Java7 unless you've tested on Java7. If we test on Java7 and pass, we can claim we're a compatible implementation in that mode; if we don't test on Java5 then we can't claim compatibility on Java5 but that does not stop us being compatible on Java7. I read it as being sufficient if we document what we require as a resource. >> >> @Henri, I ran all tests on Java6 and have not tried SQL on Java7. I'll pull the newer version and retest. > > The newer TCK does not have some of the scripts that were in the older one so I think the instructions on running it may have changed. The release notes say the User Guide is packaged separately from the TCK download. Mark, please could you check for any other updates related to this TCK. Everything that was available was downloaded and added to the ASF TCK repo. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org