tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Turnquist <>
Subject Re: When to notify of changed session IDs?
Date Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:14:02 GMT
An alternative idea would be to checkout another copy of svn, pointed at
the version where you started. I do this all the time when I don't want to
backtrack in my current working set.

I'm not sure what could be more productive than running the test suite
against a stable baseline. Kick if off and go to lunch. That way, you can
leave your existing patches intact and deal with that difference.

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Williams, Nick <>wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rainer Jung []
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:32 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: When to notify of changed session IDs?
> >>On 12.02.2013 06:03, Williams, Nick wrote:
> >>I tried to run all of the Junit tests locally, but when it completed 30
> minutes later I had dozens of failures and dozens of errors. After
> reviewing the messages carefully, I am 99.9% sure that none of these are
> due to changes I made. I don't think I have my local environment set up
> right to run unit tests. (I would appreciate some guidance on this if
> anyone has any.) The majority of the failures were due to
> "java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.tomcat.util.http.ValuesEnumerator." I am quite comfortable
> saying I didn't cause that, but I'm certainly not sure what did.
> >
> >Tests for Tomcat trunk currently run fine for me, only one error in
> TestWebSocket, all other tests pass.
> >
> >Did you "svn up" your working copy? How do you run the tests? Do you
> know, whether you get the same error when running the tests without your
> patches?
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Rainer
> Yes, I "svn up"ed my working copy. I run tests with "ant test."
> Unfortunately, I did not run the tests before I started working (stupid I
> know), and doing so would require me to revert all of my changes, recompile
> and run another 30-minute testing session :-/. Before I spend all that time
> (which I'm willing to do if I need to) I'd love if someone would suggest
> some things I might be doing wrong. I'd prefer to only have to run those
> tests one more time. :-)
> Nick
> This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are
> not the intended recipient: (1) you may not disclose, use, distribute, copy
> or rely upon this message or attachment(s); and (2) please notify the
> sender by reply e-mail, and then delete this message and its attachment(s).
> Underwriters Laboratories Inc. and its affiliates disclaim all liability
> for any errors, omissions, corruption or virus in this message or any
> attachments.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Greg Turnquist (

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message