tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-7-trunk
Date Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:23:03 GMT
On 01/11/2012 00:03, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/11/1  <buildbot@apache.org>:
>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-7-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
>> Full details are available at:
>>  http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-7-trunk/builds/890
>>
>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>>
>> Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
>>
>> Build Reason: scheduler
>> Build Source Stamp: [branch tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk] 1404380
>> Blamelist: markt
>>
>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1
>>
> 
> [junit] Test org.apache.catalina.core.TestStandardContextResources FAILED
> 
> BIO ok, NIO failed,
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat7/logs/1404380/TEST-org.apache.catalina.core.TestStandardContextResources.NIO.txt
> 
> Testsuite: org.apache.catalina.core.TestStandardContextResources
> Tests run: 4, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 10.115 sec
> 
> Testcase: testResources took 7.436 sec
> Testcase: testResourcesWebInfClasses took 1.31 sec
> 	FAILED
> (... cites content of some jsp page)
> Testcase: testResourcesAbsoluteOrdering took 0.832 sec
> Testcase: testResources2 took 0.464 sec
> 	FAILED
> (... cites content of some jsp page)
> 
> It is probably related to web fragment ordering, as those cited jsp
> pages have the following comment:
> <%--
>   Resource file that is present both fragments and the ordering need a desision!
> --%>

Yes. resources.jar and resources2.jar have no defined ordering although
the tests assume resources.jar is processed first. I'll see about fixing
that by adding a relative ordering.

Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message