Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E2EFC64F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47188 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2012 10:37:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 47029 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2012 10:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 46998 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2012 10:37:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:37:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.115] (HELO eir.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.115) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:37:10 +0000 Received: by eir.zones.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 80) id 9388B5669; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:36:49 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: [Bug 52723] An incomplete fix for the resource leak bugs in StandardManager.java Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:36:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Tomcat 6 X-Bugzilla-Component: Catalina X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: lianggt08@sei.pku.edu.cn X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@tomcat.apache.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: default X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52723 --- Comment #5 from lianggt08@sei.pku.edu.cn --- Hi, Konstantin, can you explain more about your new comment (Comment 4)? Does the BufferedOutputStream temp object need to be closed in this code piece? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org