Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35B80D1ED for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90558 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2012 19:54:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 90491 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2012 19:54:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 90480 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2012 19:54:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:54:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.12.242.68] (HELO smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) (80.12.242.68) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:54:19 +0000 Received: from mail.homeinbox.net ([2.24.223.107]) by mwinf5d59 with ME id TXtz1j00G2KedSS03XtzLc; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:53:59 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C49EAB693 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:53:59 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mail.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.homeinbox.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JA+ioHkXK9Hb for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:53:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.23.9] (study03.dev.local [192.168.23.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B681EAB688 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:53:53 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4FEB64D1.50707@apache.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:53:53 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Starting on 3.1 implementation References: <021301cd5499$51c09f00$f541dd00$@hanik.com> <4FEB603A.10002@apache.org> <022301cd549d$fed2d100$fc787300$@hanik.com> In-Reply-To: <022301cd549d$fed2d100$fc787300$@hanik.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 27/06/2012 20:49, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote: >> My current focus on Tomcat 8 is re-factoring the resources to remove all >> the JNDI stuff. After that, I'll probably look at the HTTP upgrade bit. > > [Filip Hanik] > Interesting, what's up with JNDI, prolly something I missed from an earlier > discussion? Short version - it needs cleaning up anyway - using JNDI just adds unnecessary complexity Longer version: http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/7dlsk6jyfrdrbd3l Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org