tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject [Bug 44454] busy count reported in mod_jk inflated, causes incorrect balancing
Date Mon, 21 May 2012 15:02:23 GMT

--- Comment #27 from Paul Martin <> ---
For anyone having this issue, you should know that mod_proxy can essentially be
used as a functional replacement to mod_jk.

While mod_proxy is theoretically less efficient than mod_jk, we found that the
overhead added was minimal and of essentially no consequence as the
apache-tomcat bridge was far from being the bottleneck.

I had worked around this issue by moving to mod_proxy - if this avenue is
available to you, it is worth exploring.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message