Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18CF19346 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29320 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2012 09:46:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 28544 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2012 09:46:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 28491 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2012 09:46:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:46:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.115] (HELO eir.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.115) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:46:08 +0000 Received: by eir.zones.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 80) id 20BF33C883; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:45:47 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51181] Add support for Web Sockets Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:45:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Tomcat 7 X-Bugzilla-Component: Connectors X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla@pidster.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@tomcat.apache.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #33 from Pid 2012-02-10 09:45:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > Flexibility more than anything, the developer may require access to the request > in order to determine / set the initial state of the socket or application. 4.2.1.10 says "Optionally, other header fields, such as those used to send cookies or request authentication to a server." Would just the header map be enough? Given that these are potentially long running requests, keeping the original request object around might not be such a good idea. Would passing in a minimal or partial object copy be better? You wouldn't want to be able to permit a write to the ServletOutputStream for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org