Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4775E999C for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48057 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2011 16:07:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 47996 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2011 16:07:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 47984 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2011 16:07:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:07:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antonio.petrelli@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.45] (HELO mail-qw0-f45.google.com) (209.85.216.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:06:52 +0000 Received: by qadc10 with SMTP id c10so1316999qad.18 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:06:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nUbXePG/lpveqYa9DUk1MGoVJlFa2/3g4BNG3cypR/M=; b=fN6VMYYLf7QHfnzVth0z2VpeY49WVNxKTC9FGFVaWrYnMqMgsiY9t9sHlWJ5eDKSv9 CYrugdLeg3rNx7mKLxJl/xz9tZuZGT5Li/Vn2G0GaV4KBAZmkwy8j2CxXV9aaQOkUtyf lFnc6uPa1/7g6F93VeuMGHghTEtgWiepzOd04= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.44.130 with SMTP id a2mr12707253qaf.59.1324051591714; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:06:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.224.196 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:06:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EEB6999.8020906@apache.org> References: <4EEB61B8.4010507@apache.org> <4EEB6720.5060409@gmail.com> <4EEB6999.8020906@apache.org> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:06:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Move to Nexus with no community discussion. WTF? From: Antonio Petrelli To: Tomcat Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf306f7710c9d8c004b437c807 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf306f7710c9d8c004b437c807 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Please Mark calm down. Being possible to deploy to Nexus does not mean that the project is configured to do that. To enable this, you need to configure the needed POM metadata (SCM, website) and let the master POM of Tomcat be child of the Apache Master pom. Even if you have done this steps, if you are not using the Maven release plugin, it does not work. AFAICT you should be able to (temporarily, for good) deploy to people.a.o. Antonio P.S. Your project is a mess to be a Maven project. If you *really* want to move to Maven you need to do a major reconstruction of the directory structure. 2011/12/16 Mark Thomas > On 16/12/2011 15:43, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > On 12/16/2011 04:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> It appears that Maven artefact publishing has been moved from people.a.o > >> (that all the release scripts are written to use) to using Nexus. See > [1] > >> > >> I have a number of issues with this: > >> > >> 1. There was zero discussion of this on the dev list. > >> > >> 2. Maven publishing for snapshots, release candidates and releases is > >> now broken as the release scripts have not been updated as it appears is > >> required. [2] > >> > >> Jean-Frederic, please explain ASAP what on earth is going on here. > >> Decisions such as this must happen on list *before* they are actioned. > > > > I understood it only affects the release process... > > So what? Releasing software is why this community exists. Any changes to > that process need to be agreed by the community first. > > > If that is wrong > > that I screwed it, Sorry > > Before this change, we could release artefacts to Maven Central. > > After this change, we are unable to release artefacts to Maven Central > since that part of the release process now needs re-writing. > > That is not acceptable. If there were an security issue that required an > immediate release Maven users at best would get the artefacts late or at > worst not at all. > > An apology is a good start but the stuff you have just broken needs > fixing. At the moment, I see two possible fixes. > > 1. Update the release scripts so we can release artefacts to Maven using > the new process. > 2. Revert the change to use Nexus and return to scp+rsync. > > If you don't do 1. (pretty much immediately), I intend to request that > the infra team does 2. > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org > > --20cf306f7710c9d8c004b437c807--